Jackson, Tarantino, Washington, Foxx and Waltz at premiere (l to r) |
After much praise from my from my peers,I conceded and saw DJANGO staring Oscar winner, Jamie Foxx ( Best Actor, Ray). I have been vehemently opposed to watching Quentin Tarantino films for some time now. I am appalled by his repeated use of the word "nigger" in his films, how out of context it is used on most occasions and how the media seems to never brand him as controversial as the milder Spike Lee. I admit that I admire Lee's works. He and Tarantino have distinctly different styles.
Spike Lee was critical of Django |
Nevertheless, I was impressed by the art and flow of the film, the story line and the acting. Christoph Waltz (Tarantino's Inglorious Bastards) was simply brilliant. He debunked the criticism of being the only White nominee and eventual winner of an Oscar ( Best Supporting) in his role as the German, bounty hunter Dr. Schultz. He carried the film almost single-handed. Foxx, played the familiar role as an angry, Black man with limited self-control. Foxx's acting performance was still noteworthy.He gave Djamgo, a uncanny intelligent and timing becoming a lead man. The character needed more depth and cooperation. Django had the potential to in the African American film community to be a cult icon like Michael Corleone orTony Montana. Leonardo DiCarprio (Calvin Candie), was in usual overrated fashion, sexy but, flat.
Waltz collects his second Oscar |
Overall, the idea of a Black slave killing a bunch of White folks would pay cinematic or psychological reparations, is shamefully false. In typical Tarantino fashion, the idea and reality of slavery and the relationship of Afro-America to Anglo-America is rendered a mere horror-comedy. I believe that real relationship is more of a tragic love tale that continues to be spun. Black people, to most White American relief, are not willing or wanting to kill White people or reverse roles in such monstrous acts of terrorism for retribution or retaliation. And the movie does little to right the wrongs that Tarantino has made toward Blacks in his previous films particularly with the graphic and despicable scene of dogs devouring an unwilling Mandingo slave. In his defense, however the non-education of the true Black experience is not his fault alone or his cross to bear per se.
Nevertheless, a few more positives for Tarantino, who tends to make cameos in his films, is the anachronic use of late rapper Tupac Shakur in his soundtrack during the climatic fight scene, the ability to get renowned actress, Kerrie Washington (ABC's Scandal) to go semi nude and the fact that he, himself, played an Australian mining hand, outwitted and blow up by Django Freedman (Foxx). The purity and rare on-screen afro-centricity of the love story between Foxx and Washington (Broomhilda Van Schaft) was priceless and well received. I count this film as a sold start to Tarantino making amends, but not good enough. I humbly admit that I still find Spike Lee a more superior director than Tarantino. However, subtle, Quentin has begun to finally earn my respect. I give it 4 of out of 5 stars.
At what point does controversial for controverial's sake get annoying? The story, the methodology, even the moral aside, Quintan makes movies that shock people to make money not statements. Behind the "push every boundry" director is a man that can sell a flick. That is ultimately the point isn't it?
ReplyDelete